| |
Olivopontocerebellar Atrophy
(Spinocerebellar Atrophy)
Last Updated: January 17, 2007
|
|
| Synonyms and
related keywords: spinocerebellar ataxia, SCA,
OPCA, ataxia, multiple system atrophy, MSA,
autosomal dominant cerebellar atrophy, ADCA, Menzel
OPCA, Menzel ataxia, Schut-Haymaker OPCA, Schut-Haymaker
ataxia, Dejerine-Thomas ataxia, Holguin ataxia,
Wadia-Swami syndrome, Sanger-Brown ataxia, Holmes
ataxia, Marie ataxia, Nonne syndrome, ataxia of
Holmes |
| |
AUTHOR
INFORMATION |
Section 1 of 10
 |
|
|
| Author:
Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD,
Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section
of Neurology, Dartmouth Medical School; Chief,
Neurology Service, White River Junction Veterans
Medical Center
Coauthor(s):
Syed T Arshad, MD, Staff
Physician, Department of Neurology, Dartmouth
Hitchcock Medical Center; Kalpana Kari, MD,
Staff Physician, Department of Neurology, Veterans
Affairs Medical Center, Georgetown University;
Yash Mehndiratta, MD, Assistant
Professor, Department of Neurology, Howard
University Hospital
|
| Stephen A Berman, MD, PhD, is a member of the
following medical societies:
Alpha
Omega Alpha,
American
Academy of Neurology, and
Phi Beta Kappa
|
| Editor(s): Howard A Crystal, MD,
Professor, Departments of Neurology and Pathology,
State University of New York Downstate;
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior
Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Nestor
Galvez-Jimenez, MD, Program Director of
Movement Disorders, Director of Neurology Residency
Training Program, Department of Neurology, Division
of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Florida; Selim
R Benbadis, MD, Professor of Neurology,
Director of Comprehensive Epilepsy Program,
Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery,
University of South Florida College of Medicine,
Tampa General Hospital; and Nicholas
Lorenzo, MD, Chief Editor, eMedicine
Neurology; Consulting Staff, Neurology Specialists
and Consultants |
Disclosure
| |
INTRODUCTION |
Section 2 of 10
 |
|
|
Background:
Doctors who study olivopontocerebellar atrophy (OPCA)
quickly learn that it is not a single entity. Its nosology
is confusing. The OPCA classification system overlaps with
those for the autosomal dominant spinocerebellar atrophies (SCAs)
and the autosomal dominant cerebellar atrophies (ADCAs),
which, in turn, overlap with each other. Nondominant
hereditary cases, including recessive and X-linked types,
are also described. Finally, sporadic cases of OPCA have
been reported, at least some of which are a subset of
multiple system atrophy (MSA). No wonder the subject is
confusing.
Good reasoning, however, is behind the complexity. The
study of the neurodegenerative ataxias, of which the OPCAs
are a part, has continually drawn from the exciting
interplay between clinical observations, neuropathological
analysis, and, more recently, biochemistry and molecular
genetics. Initially, clinical observation combined with
pathology were the dominant methods of carving out disease
entities from the welter of clinical observations. The first
ataxia to emerge was not an OPCA, but Friedreich ataxia (Friedreich,
1863), which Nicolaus Friedreich (1825-1882) managed to
separate from numerous other conditions, including
especially multiple sclerosis (then called disseminated
sclerosis) and neurosyphillis.
Thirty years later, Pierre Marie described another
grouping of hereditary cerebellar ataxias (Marie, 1893). In
essence, he proposed a classification to include all the
non-Friedreich ataxia cases and suggested the name "heredoataxia
cerebelleuse.” This included what is now termed the OPCAs
and several other varieties. In some families, the ataxia
was either totally or almost totally cerebellar. These would
currently not be considered OPCA cases. Other families had
different features, including brainstem and/or spinal cord
involvement, peripheral neuropathies, or retinal problems.
Some of these would be termed OPCAs based on later
standards.
In 1907, Holmes described a family with a pure cerebellar
form of ataxia and the term Holmes ataxia or ataxia of
Holmes was born and stuck to this category for decades.
Later (1922), Marie, Foix, and Alajouanine reported a
similar family that probably had the same disease. Thus,
both Holmes ataxia and the ataxia of Marie, Foix, and
Alajouanine are pure cerebellar ataxias. Neither would be
considered a type of OPCA. Sometimes, the term Marie ataxia
is also used interchangeably with ataxia of Marie, Foix, and
Alajouanine to designate a pure cerebellar ataxia. In other
cases, Marie ataxia may refer to a member of the larger
group from the 1893 paper, and, in this case, it may refer
to an OPCA. As used in practice, the term has generally been
ambiguous.
In 1900, Dejerine and Thomas identified cases that
combined purely cerebellar problems with evidence of
brainstem pathology. They coined the term OPCA. The name was
accepted by the neurological community, and many cases were
collected under this rubric. Gradually, researchers realized
that both sporadic and hereditary (mostly autosomal
dominant) cases comprised this group, and, broadly speaking,
the neuropathology typically showed degeneration of the
cerebellum with extensive cerebellar white matter
degeneration. Major neuronal loss occurs in the inferior
olivary nuclei and the pontine and arcuate nuclei. Actual
Purkinje cell loss in the cerebellum is also common but is
more variable. The white matter loss is probably due to
dying back of axons from the degenerating neurons rather
than a primary attack on myelinated tracts.
Menzel (1890) also had described a similar case. Through
the years, both Dejerine-Thomas ataxia and Menzel ataxia
have been used as terms for certain cases of either
hereditary or sporadic OPCA.
Disputes in the clinic, on paper, and in conferences have
occurred about the usage of these terms, such as fine
distinctions between Menzel ataxia and ataxia of Dejerine-Thomas,
but they are mainly now of historical interest only. OPCA
type 1 (OPCA-I), to be described below, is synonymous with
SCA type 1 (SCA-1) and is sometimes referred to as Menzel
type ataxia. Dejerine-Thomas ataxia might be used for any of
the 6 major phenotypic OPCAs, which are better defined
below. However, the authors recommend against applying
either of these terms to any new cases of ataxia. These
terms are mentioned here only so that the reader may
understand where they came from if they are encountered in
other (hopefully much older) literature.
Over time, other genetic syndromes were also elucidated,
such as ataxia-telangiectasia, originally described by
Syllaba and Henner in 1926, who reported 3 adolescent
siblings with progressive ataxia, choreoathetosis, and
ocular telangiectasia. This syndrome was examined
clinicopathologically by Boder and Sedgwick in 1957, who
named it ataxia-telangiectasia. This is not an OPCA.
In 1954, Greenfield proposed a new clinicopathological
classification, as follows:
- Type 1 - Predominantly spinal and includes
Friedreich ataxia, abetalipoproteinemia, and hereditary
spastic paraparesis
- Type 2 - Predominantly cerebellar and includes
ataxia-telangiectasia, late-onset cerebellar atrophy
(Holmes type), and Marinesco-Sjögren-Garland disease (Mendelian
Inheritance in Man [MIM] #248800; cerebellar
dysfunction, congenital cataracts, and mental
retardation)
- Type 3 - Combined spinocerebellar plus other parts
of the neuroaxis such as the brainstem; includes the
OPCAs, hereditary spastic ataxia, Ramsay Hunt syndrome,
and hereditary periodic ataxia
This classification embraced a mixture of genetic modes
of transmission. The Greenfield categorization was
elaborated in 1982 by Harding, who used a combination of
anatomical, pathological, and biochemical approaches; at the
time, it was considered very advanced and up-to-date. As
applied to the purely dominant ataxias, this produced the
ADCA classification, as follows:
- Type 1 ADCA (ADCA-1) - Ataxia and noncerebellar
findings (eg, pyramidal or extrapyramidal dysfunction
and ophthalmoplegia)
- Type 2 ADCA (ADCA-2) - Similar to ADCA-1 but
includes retinal degeneration
- Type 3 ADCA (ADCA-3) - Includes relatively pure
cerebellar dysfunction
In the ADCA grouping, the OPCAs are found in ADCA-1 and
ADCA-2.
Harding was well aware that this was essentially a
phenotypic grouping that lumped a number of different
genetic diseases into 3 classes. However, the system was
very valuable for further genetic and other scientific work,
in which Harding herself has been a significant contributor.
Working on a somewhat separate but related track, in
1970, Konigsmark and Weiner attempted to bring some order to
the heterogeneity found among the OPCAs. The proposed
classification was based on clinical, genetic, and anatomic
factors, as follows:
- OPCA-I (Menzel-type OPCA) - Autosomal dominant
- OPCA type 2 (OPCA-II or Fickler-Winkler type OPCA) -
Autosomal dominant
- OPCA type 3 (OPCA-III or OPCA with retinal
degeneration) - Autosomal recessive
- OPCA type 4 (OPCA-IV or Schut-Haymaker type OPCA) -
Autosomal dominant
- OPCA type 5 (OPCA-V or OPCA with dementia and
extrapyramidal signs - Likely autosomal dominant
- OPCA type X (OPCA-X) - X-linked OPCAs (added to
classification at later date)
These are detailed in Table 1.
In 1974, Skre studied the hereditary ataxia diseases in
western Norway and chose to consider all these disorders as
members of a comprehensive group of diseases termed
spinocerebellar ataxias. This classification then evolved in
the classification of SCAs. According to Paulson and Ammache
from 2001, it includes all well-understood types of dominant
OPCA and many other dominant ataxias. Geneticists sometimes
state that the OPCA classification has been replaced by the
SCA classification. This does not mean that every currently
defined SCA is also an OPCA. The SCAs that could typically
be considered to be an OPCA are SCA types 1, 2, 3, 7, and
possibly 17.
In addition to these major forms, which might be called
the traditional or classic OPCAs, some extremely rare
diseases also involve degeneration of the same, or very
similar, anatomical regions. These are mainly infantile or
childhood diseases. They are not what neurologists (even
pediatric neurologists) usually call OPCAs. However,
occasionally in the literature, they are called infantile
OPCAs and thus they are included in Table
2.
Table 3 lists a large number of
the known SCAs (no table of such diseases is ever totally
up-to-date for long), and those that can be reasonably
identified as OPCAs are noted.
Finally, the sporadic OPCAs are considered. According to
current knowledge, sporadic cases can be classified into the
3 following categories, which may be modified later based on
further research findings:
- Type 1 - A subtype; essentially the presentation of
MSA
- Type 2 - Sporadic cases that are not part of an MSA,
as presently understood
- Type 3 - De novo mutations that are actually genetic
cases (but authorities do not realize they are genetic)
In addition, a separate, but related, question is whether
the sporadic diseases are simply multigenetic, with the
genetics being presently too complex to recognize as such.
A large percentage of the sporadic OPCAs are a subset of
MSA. Some authorities have claimed that all sporadic OPCAs
will progress to include significant autonomic and
parkinsonian features and thus evolve into full-blown MSA if
the patient lives long enough. According to this view, MSA
typically starts as an ataxic OPCA form, an autonomic form
(Shy-Drager syndrome), or a parkinsonian form (striatonigral
degeneration). Motor neuron degeneration and dementia also
eventually occur.
However, a large and careful study by Gilman et al
published in 2000 showed that of the cases they selected for
analysis, only 25% of the sporadic OPCAs converted to
full-blown MSA within 5 years. Nevertheless, all the
sporadic OPCAs, Shy-Drager syndrome, striatonigral
degeneration, and full-blown MSAs appear on the molecular
level to be alpha-synucleinopathies; that is, they involve
abnormalities of the protein alpha-synuclein. In addition,
Jellinger reports in 2003 that the molecular pathology
involves alpha-synuclein–positive glial (and less abundant
neuronal) cytoplasmic inclusions in MSA and in all the
purported subtypes. These inclusions are also different from
the alpha-synucelinopathic inclusions (eg, Lewey bodies),
which are seen in other diseases.
The genetic OPCAs are all more pure in the sense that
they do not evolve to an MSA picture. Many of the genetic
forms are considered SCAs. Some genetic forms have
additional characteristics such as retinal involvement,
extrapyramidal degeneration, spinal cord degeneration,
dystonia, dementia, and other neurological abnormalities
dependent mainly on the genetic subtype but even showing
variability within the same subtype. For the genetic OPCAs,
the primary molecular lesion is related to the gene that
defines the genetics, rather than alpha-synuclein.
Clinical distinction of these entities is based on the
dominant feature, which may be cerebellar ataxia (observed
in OPCAs, SCAs, and MSA), parkinsonism (observed in MSA,
striatonigral degeneration, and Shy-Drager syndrome), or
autonomic failure (observed in MSA and Shy-Drager syndrome).
Whatever the subtype, the term OPCA indicates a form of
progressive ataxia distinguished by pontine flattening and
cerebellar atrophy on brain imaging studies and at autopsy.
When faced with an adult having progressive ataxia
suggestive of OPCA, the role of the clinician includes (1)
excluding readily treatable alternative diagnoses, (2)
discussing the value of genetic testing with patients in
whom such testing is informative, (3) managing symptoms, and
(4) advising the patient and family regarding the natural
history and the need to plan for the future. No definitive
therapy exists for OPCA.
Pathophysiology: The OPCAs are
progressive neurodegenerative conditions. Sporadic forms
involve abnormalities of alpha-synuclein, but that does not
fully explain the abnormality that must involve many other
yet unknown details. Many specific genes have been
identified for the genetic forms, although how the genetic
abnormalities cause the clinical findings remains uncertain.
On the gross level, brains show some common
characteristics in all cases of OPCA. The pons is
diminutive, especially in the area of the basis pontis. The
cerebellum is small with loss of Purkinje cells, but the
dentate nuclei are well preserved. The middle cerebellar
peduncles also are atrophic, possibly secondary to
degeneration of the basal pontine gray matter. The
substantia nigra of the midbrain shows evidence of tissue
loss. Cellularly, one sees neuronal degeneration in the
arcuate, pontine, inferior olivary, pontobulbar nuclei, and
the cerebellar cortex.
Additional areas of degeneration probably account for the
difference in subtypes. In sporadic OPCA, oligodendroglial
and neuronal intracytoplasmic and intranuclear inclusions
characteristic of MSA frequently are seen. Many of these are
accumulations of alpha-synuclein. In autosomal dominant OPCA,
spinal cord lesions, especially in the posterior columns,
spinocerebellar tracts, and anterior gray horn cells, are
more common. The cerebellar features may be less prominent.
However, so many variations of both the sporadic and genetic
forms are described that one can find cases that appear to
be exceptions to these generalizations.
Frequency:
- In the US: The prevalence of OPCA
is 3-5 cases per 100,000 individuals; this may represent
approximately 5-6% of patients diagnosed with atypical
Parkinson disease.
Mortality/Morbidity: The OPCAs are
progressive neurodegenerative disorders that have no
definitive treatment. Eventually, many patients become
wheelchair bound. Severe dysarthria, anarthria, and
dysphagia are not uncommon as the disease progresses.
- Morbidity increases significantly, including falls
and aspiration pneumonia.
- Enteral feeding becomes necessary for many patients.
- Death commonly results from aspiration pneumonia.
- The duration of familial OPCA is approximately 15
years. The duration of sporadic OPCA is approximately 6
years.
Race: No apparent racial preference is
observed in OPCA. This is unlike Machado-Joseph disease,
which has a predominance in certain Azorean, Indian, and
Italian families.
Sex: A male preponderance is observed in
familial cases of OPCA, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1.
However, no such distinction is seen in sporadic cases.
Age: The mean age of onset of sporadic
OPCA is 53 years. The mean age of onset of familial OPCA is
28 years (excluding the infantile forms in
Table 2).
History:
- Dysphagia and dysarthria (and occasionally anarthria)
are common manifestations of OPCA.
- Respiratory stridor from vocal cord paralysis has
been reported.
- Dementia can appear at any age; it is especially
common later in the disease.
- Urinary incontinence occurs late in the course of
the disease.
- Sleep disturbances are common in persons with OPCA.
Physical: Cerebellar signs and
extrapyramidal signs are the predominant signs of OPCA. In
addition, peripheral neuropathy is common. Ophthalmoplegia,
retinopathy, and parkinsonism may be present.
- Usually, the initial sign in OPCA is a broad-based
cerebellar ataxic gait. A parkinsonian gait is a less
common but recognized variant.
- One of the other prominent features is dysarthria
that is distinctly cerebellar in nature. The patient's
speech has a poorly modulated and slurred quality,
similar to that of a person intoxicated with alcohol.
Other cerebellar findings include nystagmus, dysmetria
on finger-to-nose testing, and ataxia on heel-to-shin
testing.
- The pyramidal finding that is most uniformly present
is a bilateral extensor plantar response. Hyperactive
deep tendon reflexes and spasticity due to pyramidal
tract dysfunction are often masked by a concomitant
peripheral neuropathy.
- Nystagmus, slow saccades, and abnormal funduscopic
examination findings are present in varying degrees.
- Hyperactive vestibuloocular reflex also has been
reported.
- In some cases, limitation of extraocular movements,
particularly of the upward gaze, also is present.
- Reflexes generally are hyperactive early in the
course of the disease but are lost later, especially
reflexes of the Achilles tendon.
- Position sense and vibratory function are reduced
secondary to neuropathy.
- Cogwheel rigidity, bradykinesia, and, occasionally,
tremor may be the dominant physical manifestations.
- The clinical manifestations of OPCA typically
consist of a slowly progressive pancerebellar syndrome
that usually begins in the lower extremities and then
progresses to the upper extremities and the bulbar
musculature. However, during the course of the disease,
serial examinations may reveal noncerebellar signs.
- Parkinsonian symptoms with rigidity and akinesia may
be the predominant picture in some cases of OPCA. In
these cases, distinguishing OPCA from Parkinson disease
may be difficult.
- The entire spectrum of cerebellar ocular motility
disorders can occur in persons with OPCA. Retinal
degeneration may be present. Nuclear or supranuclear
ophthalmoplegia occurs more frequently in familial OPCA
than sporadic OPCA.
- The clinical presentation may vary among the
subtypes of OPCA. It includes the following:
- Abnormal movements are more frequent in familial
OPCA. Abnormal movements may include myoclonus,
spasmodic torticollis, chorea, and athetosis.
- Nonpyramidal signs, such as amyotrophy,
fasciculations, peripheral neuropathy, lightning
pains, and pes cavus, are more common in sporadic
OPCA than familial OPCA.
- Autonomic failure is often seen, especially if
sensitive methods of detection such as heart rate
variability analysis are used. Severe autonomic
impairment is more common in sporadic OPCA, which
frequently evolves to a full-blown MSA.
- Postural hypotension may predominate among the
clinical features.
Causes: A unifying etiology of OPCA has
not been established. In the sporadic cases, abnormalities
of alpha-synuclein (which is found as inclusion bodies in
degenerating neurons) appear to play a significant role. In
any of the inherited cases, specific genes have been
identified, although in most cases the precise way in which
the genes exert a pathological influence is not known. Many
of the abnormal genes are of the expansion repeat variety.
For example, in OPCA-I (or SCA-1), the SCA1 gene is
on chromosome 6. It is a triple nucleotide repeat, with age
of onset correlating with the length of repeat. The SCA2
gene is on chromosome 12.
In order to clarify the subtypes of the genetically
determined OPCAs, the authors have placed them in tables.
Table 1 contains the most common
types. Although the table is largely self-explanatory, a few
points should be emphasized. The genetic OPCAs are now, at
best, a subordinate category. Many neurogeneticists would
say they are an obsolete category.
Where an OPCA represents a known mutation, it does do so
because it is identified with a specific SCA (in the case of
dominant mutations) or another specific genetically defined
disease. For example, OPCA-IV was not previously genetically
defined. In fact, the historical cases may have been
somewhat heterogeneous (which is not unusual in
retrospective analyses of genetic syndromes). However, OPCA-IV
is now believed to be genetically the same as SCA-1. OPCA-I
has also been found to be the same as SCA-1. Thus, no real
distinction can now be made between OPCA-I and OPCA-IV
except perhaps that in the historical cases of these
syndromes, some differences existed in the phenotypic
presentations of the same underlying disease. (The main
difference is that in the Schut-Haymaker OPCA-IV,
involvement of cranial nerves IX, X, and XII was noted.)
Note also in the table that OPCA-2 and OPCA-II are not
the same. OPCA-2 is identical to SCA-2 and a particular gene
is specifically associated with it. It is autosomal
dominant. OPCA-II is autosomal recessive and its gene is
unknown. It is sometimes called Fickler-Winkler syndrome
after the 2 early discoverers. Little is known of the
underlying biochemistry or genetic locus of OPCA-II.
Interestingly, some confusion exists in the older literature
and some confusion exists between the clinical descriptions
of OPCA-2 and OPCA-II. Separating the 2 types by using an
Arabic 2 and a Roman II is not fully
standard, and some books speak of the dominant versus
recessive OPCA-2 (OPCA-II). The phenotypes are not very
similar. Actually, OPCA-II is closer to OPCA-I in phenotype.
For the other numbered OPCAs, either Arabic or Roman numbers
can be used interchangeably. In this text, Roman numerals
are used for the OPCA types, with the exception of OPCA-X,
which means X-linked OPCA, not OPCA type 10.
In the organization of the table, the first column
contains the
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man number (OMIM#). The
MIM catalog was developed by Dr Victor McKusick and his
colleagues at Johns Hopkins University, and the OMIM Web
site is hosted by the US National Center for Biotechnology
Information (NCBI) on what is essentially the same Web site
as PubMed.
- Finally, the question of how the OPCAs and SCAs fit
with the 2 other systems of terminology is addressed:
(1) the ADCAs and (2) the individual eponyms that honor
the various physicians from the past who described the
conditions that are now better (though still
imperfectly) understood today.
Table 4 shows these correspondences. The first row
consists of the SCAs because these represent the most
accurate and finely divided category. The reader can
then go down each column and find the ADCA number, the
OPCAs, and the individual eponyms that are essentially
equivalent.
In using this table, realize that all of these terms
have been used inconsistently through the years. The
SCAs are most closely linked to the actual genes
involved. Although the ADCAs, with only 3 categories,
represent a rather coarse division of these conditions,
their phenotypic descriptions are rather simple and they
have generally been used consistently in those cases in
which they have been used. The use of the OPCA terms for
diagnosis has been less consistent and it has been
common to use the designation OPCA somewhat loosely.
Finally, the eponyms have not been used very
consistently, with the exception of Machado-Joseph
disease (SCA-3) (which is not an OPCA). Thus, as one
moves down the columns in the table, the names become
less reliable.
The authors recommend against using the eponyms for
fresh diagnoses. The ADCA and OPCA categories may be
helpful for formulating ideas about the diagnosis, but
one should try to think in terms of the SCA system in
order to more readily connect the patient to a proper
genetic diagnosis.
Table 4. Dominant Ataxia
Nomenclature
| SCAs |
SCA-1 |
SCA-2 |
SCA-3 |
SCA types 8, 12, 17, 25, 27,
28, (13) |
SCA-7 |
SCAs 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14,
15, 22, 26, (13) |
| OPCAs |
OPCA-1†, OPCA-IV†
|
OPCA-2 |
No OPCA matching SCA-3 |
No OPCA matching above SCAs |
OPCA-III |
No OPCA matching above SCAs |
| ADCAs |
ADCA-1 |
ADCA-1 |
ADCA-1 |
ADCA-1 |
ADCA-2 |
ADCA-3 |
| Eponyms |
Menzel type OPCA (or Menzel
ataxia) ‡, Schut- Haymaker type OPCA†,
Dejerine-Thomas ataxia |
Holguin type ataxia, Wadia-Swami
syndrome, Dejerine-Thomas ataxia
|
Machado-Joseph disease,
Dejerine-Thomas ataxia |
Dejerine-Thomas ataxia |
Sanger-Brown ataxia§,
Dejerine-Thomas ataxia |
Holmes ataxiall,
ataxia of Marie, Foix, and Alajouanine¶,
Marie ataxia¶, Nonne syndrome#
|
*SCA-13 is often said to not be part of ADCA
classification. It is mainly a childhood mental
retardation/ataxia syndrome. The ataxia is not
accompanied by significant brainstem pathology, similar
to ADCA-3. The mental retardation can be interpreted as
a dementia, putting it in ADCA-1.
†OPCA-IV (Schut-Haymaker OPCA) is now thought
to be an SCA-1, which makes it OPCA-I (ie, strictly
speaking, OPCA-IV no longer exists).
‡Menzel OPCA is sometimes taken much more
broadly as virtually any OPCA except perhaps OPCA-III.
Alternatively, it is taken as essentially the same as
ADCA-1. In addition, it is sometimes applied to sporadic
OPCAs that have similar presentations to any of the
syndromes under ADCA-1.
§Sanger-Brown ataxia is sometimes taken more
broadly. As expansively defined, the term could be used
for virtually any of these.
llHolmes ataxia is sometimes applied to pure
sporadic cerebellar ataxia of late onset.
¶This is sometimes used for most any of these
syndromes, which seems to be the sense in which it was
used in the original 1893 paper by Marie.
#This is a very obscure term. It is most
commonly used for conditions fitting ADCA-3.
**The authors found no papers calling SCA-3 Dejerine-Thomas
ataxia, but Dejerine-Thomas ataxia is so broadly
defined, the term could possibly be applied to SCA-3.
| |
DIFFERENTIALS |
Section 4 of 10
 |
|
|
Cortical Basal Ganglionic Degeneration
Friedreich Ataxia
Hallervorden-Spatz Disease
Inherited Metabolic Disorders
Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple System Atrophy
Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Degeneration
Parkinson Disease
Parkinson Disease in Young Adults
Parkinson-Plus Syndromes
Prion-Related
Diseases
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
Striatonigral Degeneration
Wilson
Disease
Other Problems to be Considered:
Shy-Drager syndrome
Refsum disease
Machado-Joseph disease
Vitamin E deficiency
|
|